Code : 9345-339926      Created Date : Sunday, August 10, 2014   Update Date : Sunday, August 10, 2014    Visit : 3947

Tissue Engineering Congress 2014 "Novel Biomaterials and Technology for use in Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering"

The report of Tissue Engineering Congress 2014 "Novel Biomaterials and Technology for use in Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering" Nasrin Lotfibakhshaiesh

 

Application Code :
306-0114-0050
 
Created Date : Tuesday, June 17, 2014 23:47:52Update Date : Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:04:14IP Address :194.225.48.94
Submit Date : Sunday, July 13, 2014 12:04:26Email : n-lotfiba@tums.ac.ir
Personal Information
Name : Nasrin
Surname : Lotfibakhshaiesh
School/Research center : School of Advanced Technology in Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Possition : Assistant professor
Tel : +98-21-88991118
E-mail : n-lotfiba@tums.ac.ir
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : Tissue Engineering Congress 2014
"Novel Biomaterials and Technology for use in Regenerative Medicine/Tissue Engineering"
Title of your Abstract : THE NOVEL BIOACTIVE GLASS COATINGS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGNEERING: AN IN VITRO STUDY
country : London/ UK
From : Monday, June 02, 2014
To : Wednesday, June 04, 2014
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : THE NOVEL BIOACTIVE GLASS COATINGS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGNEERING: AN IN VITRO STUDY

Introduction:
Metallic prostheses are widely used to treat joint and skeletal injuries and disease. However, metal alloy implants can sometimes fail due to complications of fibrous encapsulation and poor stress transfer between the bone and the implant. Bioactive glass (BG) coatings may promote the formation of a strong bond with living bone tissue thus decreasing the likelihood of fibrous encapsulation and have the added benefit that their dissolution ions stimulate cell activity [1,2]. Strontium (Sr) ranelate, a drug used to treat and prevent osteoporosis, works via the action of Sr ions which stimulate the formation of new bone and prevent osteoclast-mediated resorption [3]. We have previously shown that Sr-substituted BGs promote osteoblast activity in vitro [4] and explored the effect of altering phosphate content on the material structure of soda-lime-phosphosilicate glasses [5]. The effect of increasing phosphate content in Sr-substituted BG on cultured osteoblasts, however, remains unexplored. Here, we created Sr-substituted BG coatings with a range of phosphate contents and thermal expansion coefficients that matched that of Ti alloy, producing materials that combine the bone remodelling benefits of Sr and BG with phosphate to mediate pH changes which can affect cell viability. In the study presented here we report the characterisation of these multicomponent BG coatings in terms of their bioactivity and interaction with cells.
Materials and Methods:
Bioactive glasses in the system SiO2-MgO-Na2O-K2O-ZnO-P2O5-CaO in which 10% of the Ca was replaced by Sr and the P2O5 content was increased from 1.07 to 6.42 mol% were produced by a melt quench route. Sufficient cations were added to ensure charge neutrality in the PO43- complex formed. Simulated body fluid (SBF) was prepared according to Kokubo [6]. Glass particles (<38 micrometer) were immersed for up to 28 days and agitated at 60 rpm at 37°C. At indicated time points samples were filtered and dried for X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis.
Culture media containing ions from glasses were created by incubating 1.5g/L of glass powder (<38 micrometer) in RPMI 1640 on a roller for 4 hours at 37°C and then passed through a 0.2 micrometer filter. This media was then supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal bovine serum (FBS), 2mM L-glutamine and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin. The human osteosarcoma cell line, Saos-2, was seeded at 30,000 cells/cm2 in conditioned medium and cultured for up to 28 days. On days 1, 14, 21 and 28 cell metabolic activity was measured using the tetrazole MTT as an indicator of cell proliferation. Glasses were coated on the surface of
Ti6AL4V coupons with an enameling technique. 10,000 Saos-2/cm2 were seeded on BG coatings and viability was assessed after 1, 7 and 14 days with a LIVE/DEAD stain. Some glass coatings cultures were also fixed, gold coated and viewed on a Leo 1525 Gemini SEM.
Results and Discussion:
BG with high P2O5 content forms more apatite after immersion in SBF for 4 weeks than BG with low P2O5 content, as examined by XRD. MTT activity in Saos-2 cells treated with dissolution ions from BG increased in all samples with time in culture. MTT activity was also significantly greater (p<0.01) in cells treated with dissolution ions from 4.28 and 6.24 mol% P2O5 BGs as compared to controls at day 28. LIVE/DEAD staining indicated that all coating materials were not cytotoxic. SEM imaging demonstrated that the BG coating encouraged cell attachment and that cells spread well over the surface.
Conclusion:
With increasing P2O5 content in the series of Sr-substituted BG, Bragg peaks in XRD traces associated with apatite crystallisation increase suggesting the glass becomes more bioactive. Apatite formation on the coating surface is an essential factor for bone bonding as the more apatite that forms on the glass coating the more bone bonding will be expected. Adding P2O5 to the glass composition in a controlled range prevents extreme pH rises, which can affect cell viability and proliferation.
References:
[1] Hench LL et al. J. Inorg Mater 2002;17:897–909
[2] Jell, G, Stevens MM, J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2006. 17(11): 997
[3] Hamdy NA, Rheumatology, 2009; 48(4): 9
[4] Gentleman E, Fredholm YC, Jell G, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, O'Donnell MD, Hill RG, Stevens MM. , Biomaterials, 2010; 31(14): 3949
[5] O’Donnell MD et al., J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009. 20:1611
[6] Kokubo T et al., Biomaterials, 2006; 27:2907–15
Keywords of your Abstract : Bioactive glass, Coatings, Bone tissue engineering
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/15295/Forms/306/Acceptance & invitation letter_1.pdf
The presentation : Oral
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/15295/Forms/306/Novel Biomaterials and Technology for use in Regenerative Medicine_Tissue Engineering_1.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/15295/Forms/306/4thJuneRegen2014.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : none
If you choose other, please name :  
   
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : 50 Oral presentations
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : Germany, UK, Czech Republic, France, Switzerland, Australia, Japan, Iran
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : No
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box :  
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : Based on the questions I got after my talk, I noticed that they found my presentation interesting. Some of them suggested to run couple of tests on the samples to start the collaboration and some requested the paper that published on this study.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : 1- Dr Shara Cohen
2- Ms Sarah Edwards
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : I talked with them regarding to organizing such a conference in Iran and asked for introducing sponsor-ships. Dr Shara as a Managing Director of Euroscicon provided me with the speaker suggestions and the link for 2015 tissue engineering event. She added that finding sponsorship is not easy. We exchanged our contact details to keep in touch.
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : As the British embassy in Iran still remains closed, I faced lots of problems to get my visa. In order to apply for the visa, I had to go to Istanbul/Turkey. As it was not clear that how long the process will take I come back to Iran without my passport ( the embassy kept my passport to process my visa). This process took 3 months and I just got my visa 5 days before the conference starts. Booking flight in such a short time made it very expensive.
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : I greatly appreciate this opportunity which was very useful in terms of introducing myself and our department and interests in order to build a scientific collaboration. I took this opportunity to know the researchers who attend at the conference as well as their facilities and figure out how our department can take the benefits from their science, equipment and consultation. Creating a platform to make a collaboration between our department and some of the researcher that I met there requires a strong networking. And I tried my best to talk with them and introduce TUMS and type of researches we are doing at our department.
Your Comments :
captcha
Close