How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : |
more than 300 persons |
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : |
almost from all country around the world |
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : |
No |
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : |
|
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : |
just some ponit about different prognostic factor in breast cancer and the need for more investigation about different prognostic factors |
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : |
I met only one iranian pathologist from Mashahad( Dr Ghafarzadeh) |
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : |
Just to inform you and as I know and underestand no follow up action is needed or neccesary to talk with the members of the congress. In respect to previous congress which I had attended ,the number of Iranian pathologist were too low. So improving the political and financial situation may increase the number of attendant Iranian pathologist to be familiar with new aspect of pathology and molecular sciences.Co-operation with European and asian pathologist should be considered as future plan. Also we can invite them to come and give lecture in our annual congress. |
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : |
No special thing to mention |
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : |
This time there was not too much information about breast cancer except some more attention about evaluation of Ki67 in breast cancer which had strong controversy between different expertists. There was more emphasis on the way that breast cancer cell metastasis (molecular way). They showed some rare and beautiful cases in breast and GYN pathology.
Next congress which will be held in UK will emphasize on molecular pathology of the breast cancer. In respect to previous congresses which I had attended, the number of Iranian pathologist was too low. So improving the political and financial situation may increase the number of attendant Iranian pathologist in the congresses in order to be familiar with new aspect of pathology and molecular sciences. Co-operation with European, Middle East and Asian pathologist should be considered as future plan. Also we can invite them to come and give lecture in our annual congress. |