How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : |
about 2000 |
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : |
USA, UK, Australia, Pakistan, Iraq, Sweden, Turkey |
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : |
Yes |
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : |
WHO, UNodc, unaids, |
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : |
Epidemiology of women and addiction
Treatment Services available for women
Gender specific interventions applicable in Iranian settings. |
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : |
Prof Kathleen Brady, Distinguished professor at MUSC/USA
A/Prof Therese Killeen, at MUSC/CTN Network |
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : |
Professional capacity building is required in the field of gender specific treatment for addiction. NIDA/NIH offers opportunities for the delegated from the countries to be trained, professionalize their practices. They also offer research platforms in terms of research fellow training. Scholar visiting is negotiable with NIDA/CTN invest network |
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : |
Positive |
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : |
This congress is a well-known one holding in the United State every year. This meeting provides professionals with various platforms to make their achievements. Visiting scholars in the field of addiction, treatments, health services etc is the best example. Finding appropriate professional mentors to lead the research projects as well as to develop the best practice is another achievement. Sharing the national experiences and knowledge with others is notable through this meeting. Collaboration in research field is further chance the participants would achieve. Overall, addiction science is disseminated in a wide spectrum. |