Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Office of Vice-Chancellor for Global Strategies & International Affairs
International Human Capacity Development (IHCD)
Code : 9345-352210      Publish Date : Wednesday, December 28, 2016 Visit : 1434

Intl. Congress form | International Congress Report | International Congress Report For Faculty | 29th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.

29th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.
The report of 29th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine by Dr. Armaghan Fard-Esfahani
Application Code :
306-0216-0133
 
Created Date : Wednesday, November 9, 2016-13:26 13:26:08Update Date : Wednesday, November 30, 2016-19:24 19:24:23
IP Address : 109.162.232.200Submit Date : Wednesday, November 30, 2016-19:24 19:24:44Email :armfard@yahoo.com
Personal Information
Name : Armaghan
Surname : Fard-Esfahani
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : Professor
Tel : +98-21-88633333
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : 29th Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine.
Title of your Abstract : Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of Tc-99m octreotide and I-131 MIBG scintigraphies in diagnosis and localization of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma
Destination Country : Spain
From : Saturday, October 15, 2016
To : Wednesday, October 19, 2016
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Comparison of sensitivity and specificity of Tc-99m octreotide and I-131 MIBG scintigraphies in diagnosis and localization of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma
A. Fard-Esfahani, A. Emami-Ardekani, A. Mirzabeigi, B. Fallahi, A. Hassanzadeh-Rad, D. Beiki, P. Geramifar, M. Eftekhari; 
Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF.
Abstract
Introduction: Tc-99m octreotide scan and I-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), are both valuable agents in diagnosis and localization of neuroendocrine tumors. This study was performed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these agents in detection of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. Materials and methods: 40 patients with pathologically proven pheochromocytoma/neuroblastoma were enrolled and octreotide and MIBG scans were performed for every patient. A composite reference standard consisting of cytopathology, biomarkers, anatomical imaging and six-month follow-up data was used as a reference for final diagnosis to evaluate the scintigraphic imaging results. Lesion-based and patient-based analysis were performed. Findings: On the basis of lesion-based analysis, overall sensitivity of MIBG was better than octreotide study (94.44% vs 80.56%). Cosidering each disease separately, sensitivity of both scans for pheochromocytoma was 100 %, but MIBG study showed a higher specificity (%100) than octreotide (87.5%). In neuroblastoma, MIBG sensitivity (100%) was better than octreotide (81.25%); however specificity was higher with octreotide study (100% for octreotide versus 92.85% for MIBG). On the basis of patient-based analysis, MIBG had equal sensitivity and specificity of 100 % for both diseases. Although octreotide also had 100 % sensitivity for pheochromocytoma, its specificity was 87.50%. For neuroblastoma, octreotide study had 81.25% sensitivity and 100 % specificity. Conclusion: Both MIBG and octreotide scans show high sensitivity and specificity in detection of neuroendocrine tumors of pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma. However, MIBG scan with its better sensitivity may be considered the first line functional imaging modality; octreotide can be used to provide complementary information. It is advisable that if any of these two scans becomes negative in a patient with high clinical suspicion, the other one is performed, so that no useful data is missed in patientÂ’s management.
Keywords of your Abstract : octreotide, somatostatin receptor, neuroblastoma, pheochromocytoma
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/27807/Forms/306/Accepted abstract EANM 2016 Barcelona_1.pdf
The presentation : eposter
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/27807/Forms/306/EANM-2016_Cover_Abstract_Book.PDF
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/27807/Forms/306/PDF_abstract_2016_EANM_Barcelona_with_code.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : ISI
If you choose other, please name :  
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : About 6400 participants
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : Most of the European countries including UK, Austria, Germany, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands, France, spain, Poland, Greece... and also delegates from other continents, like China, Turkey, northern America were present in this congress.
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : SNM, AOFNMB, IAEA
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? :  
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Mohammad Eftekhari, Davood Beiki, Babak Fallahi, Saeed Farzanefar all from Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress :  
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) :  
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : EANM congress is the largest nuclear medicine congress worldwide. The congress was held in a vast area dedicated to congress programs with multiple halls and proper area for receptions, having the capacity for the huge number of participants. The scientific content of lectures and programs including continuous medical education and interesting researches in addition to interactive sessions was quite fulfilling. There were 2200 abstracts from numerous countries giving the most recent information about new nuclear medicine techniques and developments. The abstract were in the form of eposters presented by on-site computers, with the authors available to to give regarding requested information. The programs including continuous medical education, seminars and symposia were held with meticulous timing and with the best scientific results.