Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Office of Vice-Chancellor for Global Strategies & International Affairs
International Human Capacity Development (IHCD)
Code : 9345-353566      Publish Date : Monday, October 30, 2017 Visit : 2074

Intl. Congress form | International Congress Report | International Congress Report For Faculty | The report of 9th International Conference on Endocrinology and Diabetes Summit by Dr. S. Fatemeh Va...

The report of 9th International Conference on Endocrinology and Diabetes Summit by Dr. S. Fatemeh Vasegh Rahimparvar
The report of 9th International Conference on Endocrinology and Diabetes Summit by Dr. S. Fatemeh Vasegh Rahimparvar
Application Code :
762-0217-0073
 
Created Date : Saturday, October 21, 2017-13:33 13:33:30Update Date : Saturday, October 21, 2017-14:00 14:00:13
IP Address : 194.225.213.100Submit Date : Saturday, October 21, 2017-14:00 14:00:44Email : vaseghrh@tums.ac.ir
Personal Information
Name : S. Fatemeh
Surname : Vasegh Rahimparvar
School/Research center : School of Nursing and Midwifery
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : Assistant professor
Tel : +98-21-61054221
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : 9th International Conference on Endocrinology and Diabetes Summit
Title of your Abstract : Procrastination as a Key Factor in Diabetes Screening: A Qualitative Study in Women with Recent Gestational Diabetes
Destination Country : Iran
From : Wednesday, September 13, 2017
To : Thursday, September 14, 2017
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Statement of the Problem: Women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at elevated risk for developing type II diabetes. Despite the recommendation for postpartum diabetes screening in these women, the rate of the screening is low. The objective of this study was to conduct the experiences of Iranian women with recent GDM on process of diabetes screening. 
Methods: This qualitative study was conducted in Tehran, Iran in 2016. 22 women with recent GDM, who gave birth a minimum of 6 months before interview was selected by purposeful sampling method. The women were asked about their experiences about the process of attendance/not attendance in diabetes screening at 6 weeks to 6 months after child birthing, by using semi-structured interviews. The data was analyzed by using grounded theory method. 
Findings: Three main categories were extracted as postpartum diabetes screening process in women with a recent GDM, including “to be aware”, “to be sensitive” and “to perceive the severity of the threat”. Also the outcomes have been classified into four levels: Selective screening, Accidental screening, Primary lack of screening, and Secondary lack of screening. In our study, the participants had a range of procrastination in the screening, from no procrastination in selective screening to high procrastination in secondary lack of screening. Sometimes the participants had intention to the screening but without action, did not do the screening due to self-deception, and perceived the screening as lacking immediate reward (three main features of procrastination); so due to procrastination, they did not do the screening. “Screening in the range of procrastination”, as the core category, was the most obvious concept that implicitly existed in all the data. 
Conclusions: Even when sensitivity and perceiving of the threat about diabetes have been activated in women with recent GDM, procrastination may cause the women not to undertake the screening.
Keywords of your Abstract : gestational diabetes, postpartum, screening, procrastination
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/21334/Forms/762/acceptance_1.pdf
The presentation : Oral
The Cover of Abstract book :
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/21334/Forms/762/abstract_1.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : ISI
If you choose other, please name :  
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : about 50 volunteers
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : USA, India, Philippines, Colombia, South Africa, Austria, Pakistan, UK, Iran, South Korea, Egypt
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? :  
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : conference series
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? :  
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Professor Lynn Ge-Zerbe: Boise Thyroid and endocrinology PC, USA

S Chhabra: Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, India
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress :  
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : Singapore has not any embassy in Iran. So the process of visa was with some problem. The visa should be taken from Malaysia.
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : The congress was scientific and valuable. After every presentation, there were some questions about it. The discussion were useful.