Code : 9822-333396      Created Date : Monday, January 20, 2014   Update Date : Monday, January 20, 2014    Visit : 3189

AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe) conference

The Report of AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe) conference by Sara Mortaz Hejri
Sara Mortaz Hejri | International Congress Form
Application Code :
306-0213-0082
 
Created Date : Sunday, December 15, 2013Update Date : Sunday, January 05, 2014IP Address :198.105.219.101
Submit Date : Sunday, January 05, 2014Email : saramhejri@yahoo.com
Personal Information
Name : Sara
Surname : Mortaz Hejri
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Possition : student
Tel : +98-21-8897367
E-mail : saramhejri@yahoo.com
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe) conference
Title of your Abstract : Cumulative disciplinary score in an integrated pre-clinical curriculum: a novel solution for an old problem
country : Prague, Czech REPUBLIC
From : Saturday, August 24, 2013
To : Wednesday, August 28, 2013
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Background: In an integrated curriculum, in which discipline-based tests have been replaced with multidisciplinary
examinations, serious challenges may arise when students deliberately leave out the content of
those disciplines that have smaller weight in each block
exam. While reporting disciplinary scores goes against
the grain of integration, by calculating an overall score,
some of the students possibly will not study some
disciplines. We describe the experience of Tehran
University of Medical Sciences, where an organ-based
integrated curriculum has been launched since
September 2011.
Summary of work: In the first academic year, students
passed 4 blocks: Introductory, Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and Musculoskeletal. Each block included anatomy, histology, physiology, and embryology. To perform integrated assessment, questions from different disciplines were presented in single booklet while 10% of questions were truly interdisciplinary. Instead of recording each discipline’s score separately, the overall block score was reported.
Furthermore, cumulative disciplinary score was calculated at the end of the year.
Summary of results: In the end of the year, 54 medical students out of 159 did not achieve the required cumulative disciplinary score. In physiology, anatomy, histology, and embryology the number of failed students were 4, 8, 11, and 24, respectively. They were referred to take a disciplinary examination.
Conclusions: Comparing number of students who failed disciplines with low credits (e.g. histology) versus number of failed students in disciplines with high credits (e.g. physiology) suggests that the later ones had systematically been ignored by some students. The calculation of a cumulative disciplinary score reduces concern due to this problem in the integrated assessment.
Keywords of your Abstract : Integration, Curriculum, Assessment
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/14955/Forms/306/poster_2.pdf
The presentation : eposter
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/14955/Forms/306/first page_2.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/14955/Forms/306/Mortaz_2.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : none
If you choose other, please name :  
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : According to the conference reports, more than 2,000 participants had registered for the conference.
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : About one hundred countries, all around the world, were represented in the congress incliding: USA, UK, Germany, Netherlands, Canada, France, India, etc. 
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : There were plenty of organizations, just to name a few, these organizations were collaborating: • The Charles University in Prague • Masaryk University in Brno • Palacky University in Olomouc
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : The presentation was well received and many of the participants were interested in TUMS experience. Some requested clarifications, which was provided.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Professor John Norcini, Chair of Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Dr. Ibrahim Al Alwan, President of AMEEMR, Dean of College of Medicine, KSAU-HS, Riyadh
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : Since I thought there was no need to any follow up action that you should take, I was going to say no to this particular question. But, then, I found out there should be at least 50 words with three hundred characters in the text, otherwise the software would not accept it. So my answer is simply NO.
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : Since AMEE conferences are held in European countries annually, and a Schengen visa is required, I recommend the volunteers to apply for the visa as soon as possible. The first step, after getting the acceptance letter, should be sending an email to the conference and request an invitation letter.
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : In AMEE conferences about 20 to 30 sessions, including plenaries, workshops, poster and eposter presentations, short communications, etc. are held simultaneously. While it provides wide list of options for participants with different interests and expertise, selecting appropriate sessions can be challenging. It was interesting that this year a conference Application, containing the full program, was introduced, which could be used by laptops, tablets or smartphones. The App prepared a schedule and even reminded the events to the user.
The workshops I attended presented useful information and provided opportunities and ideas for research and practice, which I am going to use and develop.
The ePoster format was an exciting and valuable part of the conference. One significant advantage was that we did not carry a printed poster. We were supposed to upload the ePoster file in advance and present it in 5 minutes, using a large touch screen board.

 

Your Comments :
captcha
Close