Code : 9822-340167      Created Date : Wednesday, August 20, 2014   Update Date : Wednesday, August 20, 2014    Visit : 1930

Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM2014)

The report of Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM2014) by Mr. Ehsan Eqilimi

 

Application Code :
306-0214-0066
 
Created Date : Monday, August 04, 2014 14:12:24Update Date : Monday, August 18, 2014 14:06:10IP Address : 2.190.38.177
Submit Date : Monday, August 18, 2014 14:06:35Email : ehsun.eghlimi@gmail.com
Personal Information
Name : Ehsan
Surname : Eqlimi
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Possition : student
Tel : +98-451-7712858
E-mail : ehsun.eghlimi@gmail.com
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM2014)
Title of your Abstract : Wavelet Graphs on Mutual Information Functional Connectivity for MS Patients in Resting State fMRI
country : Germany
From : Sunday, June 08, 2014
To : Thursday, June 12, 2014
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Wavelet Graphs on Mutual Information Functional Connectivity for MS Patients in Resting State fMRI
Authors:
Ehsan Eqlimi1, Arman Eshaghi2, Nader Riyahi Alam1, Alireza Ahmadian1, Mohammad Ali Sahraian2, Hamidreza Saligheh Rad1,3
Institutions:
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 2Sina MS Research Center, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, 3Quantitative MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Group, Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging, Tehran, Iran
First Author:
Ehsan Eqlimi
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Tehran, Iran

Cortical activity in the human brain introduces a complex spatiotemporal evolution, which is modulated by hidden functional connectivity (FC).The wavelet transform is a beneficial framework for multi-scale representation of the time series data such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In the analysis of resting state FC (rs-FC), fMRI data can be modeled as a graph of nodes and edges representing brain regions or image voxels, respectively, and in order to capture their interrelationship due to existing functional activities. In traditional graph, theoretical analyses of FC in rs-fMRI are based on measuring the correlation between time series of predefined nodes or random voxels in the human brain. However, correlation by itself does not capture higher-order interactions. Moreover, in most available research works, the FC graphs have been partially defined by their binary adjacency matrix, whereas the FC graphs can be fully characterized by undirected weighted adjacency matrix. Selecting the graph theoretical features is substantial for subject pool classification purposes, since the classic graph metrics are not able to discriminate the control subjects from the patients with multiple sclerosis (MS); A chronic demyelinating disease of the CNS that affects brain both structurally and functionally. It has been shown that wide-spread abnormal network connectivity is present even at the earliest stages of this disease.
In this study, we developed a novel analysis technique for the evaluation of rs-FC in fMRI data based the weighted graphs called mutual information weighted graphs (MIWG) and spectral graph wavelet transform (SGWT) to differentiate MS from healthy controls. Two analysis types were used, one for group wise comparisons, and one for machine learning classification. Classification performance using leave-one-out cross-validation (1000 iterations) yielded a sensitivity of 78.40% and specificity of 90.40% to distinguish between MS patients and controls.
Keywords of your Abstract : fMRI, wavelet Graph, Functional Connectivity ,MS,Mutual Information
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/20597/Forms/306/Gmail_-_Fwd__2014_OHBM_Abstract_Acceptance.pdf
The presentation : Poster
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/20597/Forms/306/BookCover.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/20597/Forms/306/Abstract_1.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : none
If you choose other, please name :  
   
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : 2500
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : USA,Germany,UK,France and Japan
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : Max Planck Institute
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : 1. De-noising of the resting state data using FIX toolbox in FSL (ICA based),
2. What's the node selection and ROI strategy? Is there any specific Atlas involved?
3. Using SVM looks interesting,
4. Finding Sensitivity and Specificity looks interesting, but needs more clarification on the number of patients,
5. In case you have done subject specific analysis, it's better to do ANOVA and not using SVM, right?
6. Explain the Laplacian matrix in more details.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Anne Beauclaire
Administrative & Meeting Coordinator
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : 1-The problem of choosing the appreciate steps for image pre-processing in resting state fMRI is a delicate one and FIX toolbox could be very useful.
2-Two independent methods have been utilized for identifying centers of putative areas.
Meta-analytic was the first method, which provided a huge amount fMRI data-set for voxel identification, in case that, subjects were demanded to do various tasks.
3-4-5- We were be limiting our attention to "Wilcoxon rank sum test" for statistical evaluation and SVM is related to machine learning part of work,however Anova test seems very interesting.
6-In order to attribute an operator by analogy discrete differential operator for undirected graph we can define the Laplacian matrix L.
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : e-ticket: Via internet
Accommodation via congress
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: :
The work presented at the conference typically employs brain scanning techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, SPECT or methods such as EEG, MEG or Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Since the human brain mapping field is cross-disciplinary, OHBM members and attendees range from neurologists, psychiatrists and psychologists to physicists, engineers, and statisticians. Immense growth and dramatic new findings continue to characterize the organization.
Some useful details about comparing two graphs (based on either statistical inference (say NBS) or graph analysis (say clustering coefficient, small-worldness, efficiency etc.)) can be found in Fornito et al 2013. Long story short: We cannot compare graph measure of two network with different number of edges and nodes (=density) and also the graphs should have the same degree distribution (these limitations are different from measure to measure though).
Above stories are not related to SVM analysis though, I am just mentioning them because we are talking about the comparing the graph measure of two different groups.
Your Comments :
captcha
Close