|
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : |
More than 2000. |
|
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : |
all over the world (e.g. USA, UK, Germany, Japan,...) |
|
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : |
Yes |
|
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : |
World Stroke Organization, SAFE, ... |
|
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : |
They were positive to the study subject, asking about the characteristics of the MTS compared to the commonly used measure of spasticity. |
|
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : |
Dr. Soofia Naghdi, School of Rehabilitation |
|
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : |
I would suggest to organize an international congress on the important issue of stroke, and to invite renowned experts in the stroke to present theier experiences and knowledge for Iranian experts. We need to expand our cooperation with international organizations such as WSO to have such congresses as a forum to present the latest reserach and treament techniques. |
|
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : |
Good. |
|
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : |
It was well organized , educational based congress. Experts in Stroke and Neurorehabilitation areas were invited as speakers to deliver speech. It was a good place to review latest development in multifaceted stroke issues. I had the opportunity to exchange ideas and information with experts in stroke rehabilitation. It was interesting to me that many experts from the globe were gathered enthusiastically in this forum to learn and exchange their experiences with scientists working in this area. |