Code : 9822-349941      Created Date : Saturday, June 20, 2015   Update Date : Saturday, June 20, 2015    Visit : 2356

Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014

The report of Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014 by Anahita Fathi Kazerooni
 
Application Code :
306-0214-0089
 
Created Date : Friday, October 31, 2014 12:26:29Update Date : Monday, May 25, 2015 11:17:52
IP Address : 194.225.48.139Submit Date : Monday, May 25, 2015 11:18:48Email : anahita.fathi@gmail.com
Personal Information
Name : Anahita
Surname : Fathi Kazerooni
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : student
Tel : +98-21-66125693
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014
Title of your Abstract : Optimal Decision Tree for Classification of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses Based on DCE-MRI Quantitative
Parameters Employing Hierarchical Clustering Approach
country : Italy
From : Saturday, May 10, 2014
To : Friday, May 16, 2014
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Introduction: 
Accurate characterization of benign and malignant ovarian cancers plays a critical role in decision making about the therapeutic strategy, treatment monitoring, and could highly affect the treatment outcome. In this context, dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE-) MRI has evolved into a helpful imaging technique in distinguishing complex adnexal masses by providing noninvasive and quantitative biomarkers of tumor progression. Reliable prediction of malignancy in complex adnexal masses depends on proper selection of quantitative DCE-MRI descriptive parameters and their cutoff points, which the latter is commonly carried out by threshold criteria [1]. In this work, we exploited an unsupervised, non-parametric clustering algorithm, which does not require any prior or expert knowledge about the thresholds to select the optimal predictor parameters, followed by introducing a classification decision-tree for accurate differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors.
Materials and Methods: 
Data Acquisition: Twenty-two patients diagnosed with solid or solid/cystic complex ovarian masses (12 benign and 10 malignant as identified with histological assessment) underwent DCE-MR imaging on a 3T MR scanner (Siemens MAGNETOM Tim TRIO) using a surface phased-array coil, TE/TR = 1.74/5msec, flip angle = 60, image matrix = 156192, FOV = 2323cm2, slice thickness = 5mm, number of measurements = 52 at 6 sec/volume, number of slices = 16. The acquisition was performed before and immediately after injection of 0.2mL/kg of Gadolinium (DOTAREM; Guerbet, Aulnay, France), followed by injection of 20cc normal saline solution with 3mL/min injection rate. Pre-processing: All images were corrected for motion artifacts, using an efficient non-rigid image registration approach in a groupwise setting [2]. Data Quantification: The regions-of-interest (ROIs) were placed on the solid part of tumors and within the adjacent psoas (as an internal reference). Several semi-quantitative parameters were used for further analysis and clustering of the signal intensity curves: SImax = maximum signal intensity of tumor to that of psoas, TTP: Time-to-Peak, Wash-in-Rate (WIR) = (SImax-SI0)/TTP, IAUC60 = initial area under the time-intensity curve during the first 60 seconds in tumor to that of psoas. Clustering: Clustering was performed for each descriptive parameters, using unsupervised Hierarchical Clustering (HC) with Ward’s linkage method, before and after registration, to both determine the best descriptive parameters for diagnosing malignant from benign tumors and evaluate the effects of registration on the outcome of diagnosis. 
Results and Conclusions: 
Fig. 1 illustrates the box-and-whisker plots for TTP, SImax, WIR, and IAUC60 for both benign and malignant tumors. TTP and WIR parameters led to none and small overlaps between enhancement characteristics of benign and malignant tumors, respectively, suggesting their reliability in distinguishing cancer types. The sensitivity and specificity of each parameter in diagnosing malignancy in complex ovarian cancers are summarized in Table 1. As it can be inferred, WIR parameter returns a sensitivity of 100% in distinguishing malignant tumors (both before and after registration), and TTP produces the best specificity in comparison with SImax and IAUC60 parameters. In several studies, the early enhancement (TTP) is confirmed to be an indication of malignancy [3], and WIR is shown to be correlated with the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [4]. Also, it can be observed that registration can significantly improve the outcome of tumor characterization, in the sense that the parameters would become more reliable to characterize the cancer malignancy. Regarding these results, WIR and TTP were combined to develop a decision tree for classification of malignant from benign tumors (Fig. 2), which generated promising results on the data with 95% of accuracy before and 100% after registration. This result recommends that optimizing the decision approach could compensate for misalignment of data, which is essentially important when proper registration software is not available or feasible in a clinical diagnosis setting. In conclusion, we proposed a decision tree classifier developed through an unsupervised clustering approach, which is unbiased to the threshold values of the parameters and provides a more flexible framework for increasing the positive prediction rate for distinguishing malignant from benign complex ovarian tumors.
Keywords of your Abstract : Female Pelvis; Ovarian Cancer; Classification
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/22031/Forms/306/Acceptance Letter_6.pdf
The presentation : Oral
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/22031/Forms/306/indexSMART_3.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/22031/Forms/306/AnahitaISMRM.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : other
If you choose other, please name : Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : over 5000
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : The pioneers of the society of magnetic resonance in medicine (ISMRM) and the European society of magnetic resonance in medicine and biology (ESMRMB) from USA, Canada, European Countries
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box :  
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : No specific concerns, just suggestions to improve technical aspect of the work and use pharmacokinetic modeling instead of semi-quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : (1) Professor Anwar Padhani,internationally recognized Oncological MRI radiologist at the Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
********************************
(2) Professor Thomas Chenevert, Professor of Radiology, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan

***********************
Professor Susan Ascher, Professor and Co-Director, Abdominal Imaging

MedStar Georgetown University Hospital
Department of Radiology, USA
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : There are no follow-up actions required to take with the members of the congress. I attended the full 7 days of the conference, had an oral presentation (on Thursday 15 May), one e-poster (on Monday 12th May) and one traditional poster (Monday 12th May) presentations during this period. ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : I bought my tickets online using an agency introduced by the conference, and this agency gave me tickets with several transits (in Istanbul, Brussels on the way to Milan). During these transits, they lost my luggage and I did not have it for 24 hours. 
For lower costs, I reserved a hostel (instead of hotel) in Milan, which did not have enough facilities.
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : ISMRM conference is the important conference on MRI in Medicine worldwide, which is held every year and gathers the scientists and pioneers of the field for sharing knowledge and bringing new ideas and solutions to several topics in the field of MRI. Several scientists are invited to hold educational sessions, where the audience would learn about the concepts and the pearls and pitfalls of several MR techniques. The work I presented was a recommended clinical decision tree for discrimination of benign and malignant complex ovarian masses, which is essential for decision making about the patient's surgery and therapeutic strategy. Beside my own oral presentation, I attended several educational and scientific sessions, like pre-clinical cancer session, which gave me deeper insight about how to approach the problems in my research works in the field of MRI in cancer. I got ideas about how to improve my work and to incorporate state-of-the-art techniques into them.

 

Your Comments :
captcha
Close