Code : 9345-351890      Created Date : Wednesday, October 5, 2016   Visit : 1350

XXV EUROPEAN CONGRESS of PERINATAL MEDICINE

The report of XXV EUROPEAN CONGRESS of PERINATAL MEDICINE by Dr. Mehrnaz Valadan
 
Application Code :
306-0216-0095
 
Created Date : Monday, February 15, 2016-10:02 10:02:29Update Date : Sunday, September 18, 2016-12:12 12:12:54
IP Address : 194.225.49.138Submit Date : Sunday, September 18, 2016-12:13 12:13:24Email : mehrnaz_valadan@yahoo.com
Personal Information
Name : Mehrnaz
Surname : Valadan
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : Associate professor
Tel : +21-261-13908
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : XXV EUROPEAN CONGRESS of PERINATAL MEDICINE
Title of your Abstract : Evaluation of risk factor and complication of umbilical cord prolapsed in cesarean section
Destination Country : Netherlands
From : Wednesday, June 15, 2016
To : Saturday, June 18, 2016
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Considering the rarity of umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) and lack of accurate data about the risk factors and health outcomes, we aimed to evaluate cases of cesarean section (CS) due to UCP in order to reduce treatment costs and provide information about the mortality and morbidity associated with this condition.
Patients & Methods: Of 35,259 cases of CS performed in four hospitals during 2004-2012, 103 cases of UCP were selected as the case group; on the other hand, 318 cases without UCP were classified as the control group. Information was extracted from patients' records and analyzed by SPSS version 18.
Results: Prevalence of UCP was estimated at 0.2%. In the case group, the active phase of labor was reported 1.4 times (81% vs 57%-P<0.00), engagement 8 times (14% vs 2% -P<0.001), transverse presentation 8 times (6% vs 2%-P<0.002), grand multiparity 3.9 times (4% vs 0-P<0.001), oligohydramnios 4.7 times (5% vs. 0-P<0.0001, and polyhydramnios 5.9 times (6% vs 0 - P<0.001). UCP was more prevalent in post-term deliveries (P<0.043). One-minute Apgar score < 7 was 3 times more prevalent in neonates of the case group (P<0.00). Prepartum vaginal bleeding was 4 times more common in the case group, compared to the control group; also, decreased fetal movement and heart rate drop were more prevalent in the case group. Mortality rate was 5.2% in the case group and 1.7% in the control group. Overall, the control group had a better general health at discharge, compared to the case group.
Conclusion: A statistically significant correlation was detected between UCP and gestational age, active phase of labor, fetal presentation, engagement, parity, and amniotic fluid volume.
Keywords of your Abstract :
Umbilical cord Prolapse; CS; Risk factors; complications of Umbilical cord prolapsed
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/28861/Forms/306/acceptance letter_2.pdf
The presentation : eposter
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/28861/Forms/306/ECPM2016_ABSTRACTBOOKTheJournalofMaternal-FetalNeonatalMedicine_1.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/28861/Forms/306/ECPM2016_ABSTRACTBOOKTheJournalofMaternal-FetalNeonatalMedicine_2.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : Pubmed
If you choose other, please name :  
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : 1500
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : Netherlands, France, China, Iran, Canada
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : different universities
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : Considering the rarity of umbilical cord prolapse (UCP) and lack of accurate data about the risk factors and health outcomes, evaluation of cases of cesarean section (CS) due to UCP in order to reduce treatment costs and provide information about the mortality and morbidity associated with this condition was very interesting to them. specially that the number of patients we assessed were 103 out of 35259 patients.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Jan Nijhuis

Professor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : The ECPM is a biannual meeting where about 1500-2000 specialists in the field of perinatal medicine meet. With specialists they not only mean midwives, obstetricians and neonatologists but also those professionals who work in the very important adjacent fields such as child pathology, paediatric surgery, genetics, prenatal diagnosis and IVF. Also epidemiologists and health care workers found the conference interesting.

The conference consisted of a great offer of keynote lectures by speakers with international esteem during plenary and parallel sessions with enough time allotted for discussions. Participants were also invited to present their data in oral or poster presentations, based on the content of their abstracts.

During the conference, you updated on all important issues in the whole spectrum of the perinatal field, e.g. preconceptional counselling, genetics and prenatal diagnosis, high-risk pregnancies and deliveries, neonatal delivery management, problems of preterm and term infants, ethical issues and follow-up. So the congress was wonderful and is good to ask them how they organized the wonderful congress.
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : I reserved my hotel by booking.com which was easy and cost effective.
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : I arrived to the congress venue on 15th of June.Although I did not pay my registration fee in advance, every thing was ready. My name was there and my badge and congress information was ready. I paid the registration fee and got my documents and invoice very fast. The venue was very nice and beautiful. there were about 4 conference places. we could chose which one we were interested to participate. I mostly participated in prenatal assessment for down syndrome which was very helpful. Also there were many lectures about emergency situations which was very helpful.

 

Your Comments :
captcha
Close