Code : 9345-352478      Created Date : Wednesday, March 1, 2017   Visit : 1265

The report of 15th World Congress in Fetal Medicine by Dr. Mahboobeh Shirazi

The report of 15th World Congress in Fetal Medicine by Dr. Mahboobeh Shirazi
Application Code :
306-0115-0063
 
Created Date : Saturday, February 8, 2014-20:27 20:27:50Update Date : Wednesday, February 15, 2017-14:12 14:12:44
IP Address : 194.225.49.138Submit Date : Tuesday, July 26, 2016-14:06 14:06:43Email : Mahboobeh.shirazi@yahoo.in
Personal Information
Name : Mahboobeh
Surname : Shirazi
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : Associate professor
Tel : +98-21-88900002
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : 15th World Congress in Fetal Medicine
Title of your Abstract : Pregnancy outcome in amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: 10-year report
Destination Country : Spain
From : Sunday, June 26, 2016
To : Thursday, June 30, 2016
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Background: Chorionic villus sampling refers to a procedure in which small samples of placenta are obtained for prenatal genetic diagnosis, generally in the first trimester of pregnancy in 11weeks-13weeks+6days. This procedure provides prenatal diagnosis in pregnancy. Amniocentesis is a technique for windrowing amniotic fluid from the uterine cavity using a needle via a trans abdominal approach. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling are invasive prenatal procedure. Their complications are fetal loss vaginal bleeding, rupture of membrane chorioamnionitis and limb reduction. There are some probable predictors of fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis including maternal age, gestational age, number of needle insertion, previous miscarriage, and placental location. The aim of this study was to compare procedure related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in a tertiary referral hospital in Iran.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was done in pregnant women who were high risk in genetic screening tests. The pregnancy outcome of women who underwent amniocenthesis and chorionic villus sampling was assessed in Yas Women General Hospital (Mirza Kuchak Khan), Tehran, Iran, from 2001 to 2011. Group one,, pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis; was compared with group two, pregnant women that underwent chorionic villus sampling. The statistical analyses were performed with SPSSv.20 using a significant level of α=0.05.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in procedure related fetal loss before 24th weeks of pregnancy (1.1% in chorionic villus sampling group versus 0.6% in amniocentesis group, P value=0.318). A significant relationship between the number of needle insertion in the chorionic villus sampling group and fetal loss before 24th weeks of pregnancy was seen P value <0.028. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the occurrence of vaginal bleeding, rupture of membrane, pre-term birth, placenta location, low birth weight and very low birth weight. The risk of chorioamnionitis was higher in chorionic villus sampling group (p Value 0.019). No significant difference was observed between the liquid and bloody amniotic fluid and pregnancy complications.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the procedure related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.
Keywords of your Abstract : Fetal loss, chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, invasive diagnostic procedures, pregnancy outcome
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/16253/Forms/306/Acceptance paper as poosterdocx_1.pdf
The presentation : Poster
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/16253/Forms/306/Jeld Title 15th World Congress in Fetal Medicine_1.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/16253/Forms/306/Pooster AS FMF Spain_1.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : Scoups
If you choose other, please name : Tums Journal
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : 2000 persons
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : 87 countries
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : No
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box :  
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : I had not oral talking therefore there were not any question but I answered some question about my poster that fetal monitoring is obligatory in Iran or not and other procidures such as scalp sampling we do or not.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : i met prof kyprous Nicholides
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : The noisy was very high. sunteck city was a big center in Singapore for shopping and festivals. There was a lot of music sounds in the second day from shopping center and we didnt hear the sound of lecturers. The food was normal food and muslem food. I think its better to say Helal and not Helal or muslem and non muslem food.
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : Its better to help members of medicine faculty to go 2 timesevery year
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : I think we should have data base for our patients. The authors had their own data base in their hospitals. Unfortunatly, we are not link to gether in our haspitals. We should use fromtechnology software. It is important to go to developed country for short time periods 6-9 months for learning new procidures. United kingdom and USA are two countries that in perinatology are very good for advance education. posters and lectures were new. Our level in fetal surgery is not up date, also for maternal is ok. my opinion we should have data base.

 

Your Comments :
captcha
Close