Code : 9345-353813      Created Date : Saturday, December 30, 2017   Visit : 1140

The report of 37th Congress of Société Internationale by Dr. Gholamreza Pourmand

The report of 37th Congress of Société Internationale by Dr. Gholamreza Pourmand
 
Application Code :
762-0217-0096
 
Created Date : Sunday, November 12, 2017-10:54 10:54:33Update Date : Saturday, December 2, 2017-13:13 13:13:56
IP Address : 194.225.214.18Submit Date : Saturday, December 2, 2017-13:14 13:14:29Email :gh_pourmand@yahoo.com
Personal Information
Name : Gholamreza
Surname : pourmand
School/Research center : School of Medicine
If you choose other, please name your Research center :  
Position : Professor
Tel : +21-663-48560
Information of Congress
Title of the Congress : 37th Congress of Société Internationale
Title of your Abstract : Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score:
Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results
Destination Country : Portugal
From : Thursday, October 19, 2017
To : Sunday, October 22, 2017
Abstract(Please copy/paste the abstract send to the congress) : Preoperative Gleason score (GS) obtained from Trans Rectal Ultra Sonography (TRUS) is the
most common grading system to evaluate the appropriate treatment for patients with clinically localized
prostate cancer. But this method showed upgraded and downgraded results in comparison to Gleason score
obtained from radical prostatectomy. The current study aimed to determine clinical or pathological variables
to reduce the differences between biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores.Through retrospective
review of 52 patients with radical prostatectomy, this study examined the correlations of preoperative
Gleason score with age, prostate volume, PSA level, PSA density, digital rectal exam findings and percentage
of positive core needle biopsies across two groups, including patients with preoperative GS≤6 (i.e. group one)
and patients with preoperative GS≥7 (group two). The discordance between biopsy GS and radical
prostatectomy GS was observed to be 52% in the current study. Among patients with preoperative GS≤6,
prostate volume (P=0.026), PSA density (P=0.032) and percentage of positive core needle biopsies (P=0.042)
were found to be significant predictors for upgrade. There was no significant predictor for downgrade in
patients with preoperative GS≥7. Findings of this study revealed that in patients with preoperative GS≤6,
smaller prostate volume, higher prostate density and higher positive results of core needle biopsies were
associated with theupgrade of GS. Therefore, it should be considered when selecting treatment modalities
among these patients.
Keywords of your Abstract : Grade change; Prostate adenocarcinoma; Radical prostatectomy; Gleason score
Acceptance Letter : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/12026/Forms/762/99999999.pdf
The presentation : eposter
The Cover of Abstract book : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/12026/Forms/762/Cover_of_Abstract_book.pdf
Published abstract in the abstract book with the related code : http://gsia.tums.ac.ir/images/UserFiles/12026/Forms/762/accept_letter.pdf
Where has your abstract been indexed? : other
The Congress Reporting Form
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : 2000
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : all over the world
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : Yes
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : AUA(American Urological Association)-EAU( European Association of Urology)-Pan-African Urological Surgeons Association Symposium-Urology in the Middle East Symposium-Urological Association of Asia Symposium
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : 1. Several questions were raised regarding the below subjects (posters):Can testosterone level be a good predictor of late-onset
hypogonadism?
Correlation of Preoperative and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score: Examining the Predictors of Upgrade and Downgrade Results 
Also, as the chair of the session Moderated ePosters 2:Stones 1, I answered questions raised following the session.
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : Prof.Michel Morbeger
Prof.Jean dela rossete
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress :  
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : Turkish Airline:ok Accomnodal
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : The program was exccelent the exents expecially general assenbly all session starled of closed in time was good

 

Your Comments :
captcha
Close