|
How many volunteers were present at the Congress? : |
4000 |
|
Delegates from which countries presented in the congress? : |
USA; JAPAN;GERMANY; GREAT BRITAIN: SPAIN; AUSTRALIA; MEXICO; |
|
Were the delegates of any other organizations present in the congress? : |
Yes |
|
If yes, please write the names of the organizations in the box : |
CNS,WFNS,EANS |
|
What were the responses to your talking points? Were specific questions or concerns raised? : |
Yes. They discussed different techniques including repair of residual processus vaginalis and simultaneous repositioning of catheter. |
|
If you met staff members, please list their full names & positions. : |
Prof.Resnick, chief of CNS, USA
Prof. Couldwell, head of AANS
Prof. Tu , chief of WFNS |
|
Please inform us if there are any follow up actions we need to talk with the members of the congress : |
Fellowship courses could be applied for young neurosurgeons. They provide research fellows. They are interested to work with Tehran university and provide neurosurgical society to cooperate with Iranian colleagues. Many Iranians such as prof. Sanai and Aarabi are at high positions and could help others. |
|
Your experiences about the travel processes(Providing ticket, accommodation,...) : |
Very expensive: 1500€!, but nice place and safe flight |
|
Please give a briefing of your own observations and outcomes of the congress: : |
There were interesting surgical Simulators for education of residents.
Very informative courses and also 3D anatomy courses were Held.
New ideas could be found there. The technical aspects and close relation to basic scientists are unique. Some fellowships such as peripheral nerve were not present in Iran.
They used hybrid education for vascular neurosurgeons to learn endo- and open surgeries. Combination of different visualization methods and genetic markets are in progress and it seems necessary in Iran.
Young neurosurgeons have their own organizations. |